Contract-turnover assessment

From vehicle checks to a fleetwide truth.

A structured assessment gave incoming leadership a defensible condition baseline across 121 vehicles—without burying the signal in hundreds of inspection rows.

This public case study shows verified aggregate results and approved anonymized detail imagery only. Client identity, asset numbers, costs, personnel, and row-level findings remain private.
121Vehicles assessed
427Findings documented
3Median per vehicle
9Finding categories

Finding profile

Mechanical risk dominated the baseline.

Mechanical, exterior, and interior categories accounted for 348 findings—81.5% of the documented total.

49.6%

Mechanical · 212

17.6%

Exterior · 75

14.3%

Interior · 61

4.9%

HVAC · 21

4.7%

Wheels & tires · 20

4.0%

Safety · 17

3.0%

Body & frame · 13

1.6%

Lighting & electrical · 7

0.2%

Documentation · 1

Assessment workflow

Evidence that moves into action.

  1. 01

    Inspect

    Apply a consistent vehicle-level inspection structure.

  2. 02

    Classify

    Normalize findings into clear fleetwide categories.

  3. 03

    Prioritize

    Separate immediate risk from planned corrective work.

  4. 04

    Mobilize

    Give leadership a clear baseline for ownership and execution.

Field evidence, anonymized

Detail without client exposure.

Only approved detail imagery is used here. Visible faces, plates, VINs, unit numbers, client branding, documents, screens, locations, and identifying labels are excluded.

Close technical inspection view of protected wiring routing
Harness routing and protectionPotential chafe points documented before service exposure.
Close inspection view of vehicle door-frame workmanship
Fit and finish evidenceCondition captured, classified, and tracked through the corrective path.

Bring us the hard problem

What would reliable look like for your fleet?

Start with the current condition. We’ll help define the next move.

Request a Fleet Assessment